<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>controlguru.com is an e-textbook on best practices and proven methods for automatic process control</title>
      <link>http://www.controlguru.com/</link>
      <description>Proven Methods and Best Practices for PID Process Control</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 00:00:01 EST</pubDate>
      <managingEditor>doug.cooper@controlguru.com</managingEditor>
      <webMaster>doug.cooper@controlguru.com</webMaster>
      <item>
         <title>Static Feed Forward and Disturbance Rejection in the Jacketed Reactor (by Doug Cooper and Allen Houtz)</title>
         <link>http://www.controlguru.com/2008/082408.html</link>
         <description>We build on the foundation of the previous feed forward articles as we explore the popular and 
          surprisingly powerful static feed forward computational element for improved disturbance rejection. We 
          explore the application and benefit of static feed forward with feedback trim on disturbance rejection 
          performance for the jacketed stirred reactor process.</description>
         <pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 00:00:01 EST</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Feed Forward Uses Models Within the Controller Architecture (by Doug Cooper and Allen Houtz)</title>
         <link>http://www.controlguru.com/2008/072008.html</link>
         <description>The "feed forward with feedback trim" architecture is constructed by coupling 
	 a feed-forward-only controller to a traditional feedback controller. The 
	 feed forward controller output signal, COfeedforward, is computed by combining 
	 a process model and disturbance model. The process model describes 
	 or predicts how each change in CO will impact PV. The disturbance model  
	 describes or predicts how each change in D will impact PV. </description>
         <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 00:00:01 EST</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The Feed Forward Controller (by Doug Cooper and Allen Houtz)</title>
         <link>http://www.controlguru.com/2008/050408.html</link>
         <description>A feed forward controller receives a measured disturbance signal, uses it to predict an impact 
         on the process variable, and then computes preemptive control actions that counteract the predicted 
         impact as the disturbance arrives to maintain the process variable at set point (PV = SP) throughout 
         the disturbance event.</description>
         <pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 00:00:01 EST</pubDate>
     </item>
     <item>
         <title>Ratio with Cross-Limiting Override Control of a Combustion Process (by Allen Houtz and Doug Cooper)</title>
         <link>http://www.controlguru.com/2008/041308.html</link>
         <description>Here we explore the addition of a second select override element to create a 
         cross-limiting architecture that prevents the air/fuel ratio fed to the burner from becoming overly 
         rich (too much fuel) or lean (too much air) as operating conditions change. Variations on this 
         cross-limiting architecture are widely employed within the air/fuel ratio logic of a broad range 
         of industrial combustion control systems.</description>
         <pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 00:00:01 EST</pubDate>
     </item>
     <item>
         <title>Ratio Control and Metered-Air Combustion Processes (by Allen Houtz and Doug Cooper)</title>
         <link>http://www.controlguru.com/2008/012708.html</link>
         <description>A ratio control strategy can play a fundamental role in the safe and profitable operation of 
          fired heaters, boilers, furnaces and similar fuel burning processes. This is because the air-to-fuel ratio 
          in the combustion zone of these processes directly impacts fuel combustion efficiency and environmental emissions.
          A requirement for ratio control implementation is that both the fuel feed rate and combustion air feed rate 
          are measured and available as process variable signals.</description>
         <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 00:00:01 EST</pubDate>
      </item>
     <item>
         <title>Integral (Reset) Windup, Jacketing Logic and the Velocity PI Form (by Doug Cooper)</title>
         <link>http://www.controlguru.com/2008/021008.html</link>
         <description>A valve cannot open more than all the way. A pump cannot go slower than stopped. Yet 
          an improperly programmed control algorithm can issue such commands. Herein lies the problem of 
          integral windup (also referred to as reset windup or integral saturation). It is a problem that 
          has been around for decades and was solved long ago. We discuss why it occurs and how to prevent 
          it to help those who choose to write their own control algorithm.</description>
         <pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 00:00:01 EST</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Controller Gain Is Dimensionless in Commercial Systems (by Doug Cooper)</title>
         <link>http://www.controlguru.com/2007/110407.html</link>
         <description>Like most control room displays, the Controlguru.com e-book presents PV values 
         in engineering units. These are used directly in tuning correlations 
         to compute controller gains, Kc. As a result, the Kc values also carry engineering units.
         The benefit of this approach is that Kc maintains the intuitive familiarity 
         that engineering units provide. The difficulty is that commercial controllers are normally 
         configured to use a dimensionless values. This article explores how to convert a Kc with 
         engineering units into the standard dimensionless (%/%) form.</description>
         <pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 00:00:01 EST</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>An Implementation Recipe for Cascade Control (by Doug Cooper)</title>
         <link>http://www.controlguru.com/2007/090207.html</link>
         <description>When improved disturbance rejection is our goal, one benefit of  
         cascade control over a feed forward strategy is that implementing a cascade builds upon our 
         existing skills. A cascade has two controllers, and the proecedure is a familiar task because 
         it essentially is to employ our controller design and tuning recipe twice in sequence.</description>
         <pubDate>Sun, 2 Sep 2007 00:00:01 EST</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The Cascade Control Architecture (by Doug Cooper)</title>
         <link>http://www.controlguru.com/2007/070607.html</link>
         <description>Cascade control is an architecture 
         capable of reducing the impact of disturbances on our measured process 
         variable (PV). To construct a cascade architecture, we literally nest a secondary control loop 
         inside a primary loop as shown in the block diagram.</description>
         <pubDate>Fri, 6 Jul 2007 00:00:01 EST</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>PI Control of the Integrating Pumped Tank Process (by Bob Rice and Doug Cooper)</title>
         <link>http://www.controlguru.com/2007/042507.html</link>
         <description>The control objective for the pumped tank process is to maintain liquid level 
         at set point by adjusting the discharge flow rate out of the bottom of the tank. This 
         process displays the distinctive integrating (or non-self regulating) behavior, and as such, 
         presents an interesting control challenge. </description>
         <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:00:01 EST</pubDate>
      </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

